Posts Tagged G. E. Moore
Review of “Ethical Intuitionism: Re-Evaluations”
Posted by ausomeawestin in Metaethics on March 22, 2014
Ethical Intuitionism: Re-evaluations I tend to shy away from anthologies, as such collections often bring together essays not in proper dialogue (as opposed to an author’s dialogue with himself throughout the course of his book); this collection is an exception, most likely due to the narrow focus on a epistemological view in morality. In fact, […]
Allan Gibbard, anti-realism, Berys Gaut, Brad Hooker, coherentism, Cornell realism, David McNaughton, ethical intuitionism, Ethical Pluralism, Ethics, foundationalism, foundationalism vs coherentism, G. E. Moore, generalism vs particularism, Internalism and externalism, Jonathan Dancy, ludwig wittgenstein, metaethics, moral motivation, moral non-naturalism, moral particularism, moral perception, moral pluralism, moral realism, Morality, naturalism vs non-naturalism, Nicholas Sturgeon, Philip Stratton-Lake, philosophy, Robert Arrington, Robert Audi, Roger Crisp, self-evidence, self-evident beliefs, Stephen Darwall, the open question argument, The Right and the Good, Thomas Baldwin, W.D. Ross, wittgenstein
The Argument From Disagreement (and moral vs. non-moral facts, realism and intuitionism)
Posted by ausomeawestin in Metaethics, Morality on February 26, 2014
Earlier today I posted an entry on how ethical dilemmas and moral disagreements can be caused by disagreement on the non-moral facts of a case, such that moral disagreements aren’t by themselves reasons to doubt the objectivity of morality, as the moral anti-realist holds; now seems a good time to explore the ways in which […]
anti-realism, ethical intuitionism, Ethics, G. E. Moore, metaethics, moral belief, moral disagreement, moral knowledge, moral realism, Morality, Philip Stratton-Lake, philosophy, Robert Audi, self-evidence, self-evident beliefs, the argument from disagreement, the is/ought gap
On Moral Realism and Mind-Independence (and complex, non-natural properties)
Posted by ausomeawestin in Metaethics, Morality on February 6, 2014
Among non-natural moral realists there is a fascinating debate over whether basic moral properties, such as the properties of ‘goodness’ and ‘rightness’, are simple or complex properties. It is a fruitful debate to have, particularly because it seems many objections to non-naturalism have been against non-naturalist views that posit that ‘good’ is a simple property, […]
anti-realism, complex property, David McNaughton, ethical intuitionism, Ethics, G. E. Moore, good, goodness, J.L. Mackie, metaethics, moral motivation, moral naturalism, moral non-naturalism, moral properties, moral realism, moral reductionism, Morality, natural property, natural vs. non-natural properties, naturalism vs non-naturalism, non-natural property, objectivity, Philip Stratton-Lake, philosophy, rightness, simple property, simple vs. complex properties, supervenience, the open question argument, W.D. Ross
Euthyphro pt I (and constructivism, and why we don’t need god for morality)
Posted by ausomeawestin in Metaethics, Morality on January 29, 2014
One of the more reoccurring debates I get involved in here on WordPress is whether or not an objective morality is possible for atheists. Most of the time this involves me commenting on posts that posit that secular morality isn’t possible, such that I take it upon myself to show theists where their critique of […]
constructivism, dilemma, Ethics, Euthyphro, G. E. Moore, god, metaethics, moral naturalism, moral non-naturalism, moral realism, moral reductionism, Morality, naturalism vs non-naturalism, Platonism, religion, secular morality, Socrates, Socratic dialogue, supervenience, theist vs. secular morality, theistic morality
Moral Twin Earth pt I (and the open question argument, Cornell realism, and the causal theory of reference)
Posted by ausomeawestin in Metaethics on January 1, 2014
One of the more reoccurring sci-fi plot devices is that of traveling to a “twin” earth, where persons are for the most part the same, except that different events have occurred; a recent heated debate in metaethics has been on what occurs when, stipulating that each party has discovered the objective moral truths of the […]
causal theory of reference, Cornell realism, earth, error theory, functionalism, G. E. Moore, Geoffrey Sayre-McCord, goodness, Hilary Putnam, Mark Timmons, moral naturalism, moral realism, moral twin earth, naturalism vs non-naturalism, philosophical naturalism, philosophy, richard boyd, rightness, Saul Kripke, science fiction, semantics, sui generis, supervenience, synthetic property identities, the argument from disagreement, the naturalistic fallacy, the open question argument
Recent Posts
- Review of Peter Frase’s Four Futures: Life After Capitalism
- Exploitations, Primary and Secondary, in the Capitalist Mode of Production
- Radiohead and Rupture: A Moon Shaped Pool, and A Doom Shaped (Labor) Pool
- A Week of New Duos: Reviews: Iyer & Smith, Iggy Pop & Homme, Batman & Superman
- Neoliberalism was the Grounding for the Sacrifice of Flint to Capital, yet Obama Thinks Neoliberalism will Save Flint
Archives
- December 2016
- September 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
Tags
agent-causal libertarianism Alan Turing alienation Allan Gibbard amoralism ancient philosophy anti-cognitivism anti-Humeanism anti-realism anti-terrorism anti-war Anxiety applied ethics a priori Aquinas Argentina argument from analogy Aristotle art Artificial Intelligence ASPCR Barack Obama Batman Bernard Williams Bernie Bernie Sanders black lives matter caffeine capitalism capital punishment Categorical imperative cellphone tracking Chris Hedges Christine Korsgaard Christopher Nolan CISA class climate change Clinton coffee cognitivism Cognitivism vs. non-cognitivism comedy compatibilism conceptual role semantics consciousness Consequentialism constructivism contextualism Cornell realism corporate totalitarianism criminal Critique of Pure Reason cultural diversity David Brink David Hume David McNaughton death democracy deontology Department of Justice descartes desires determinism dilemma dreams drugs duties duty-based ethics egalitarianism elite end and extrinsic value end value end vs instrumental value epistemology equality Equal opportunity error theory Ethical dilemma ethical intuitionism Ethical Pluralism Ethics Existentialism expressivism factualism Fear foundationalism vs coherentism freedom free will Frege-Geach Problem Friedrich Nietzsche functionalism fundamental rights G. E. Moore generalism vs particularism gig-economy Gilbert Harman good goodness good will Greg Grandin Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals Guantanamo Bay gun control gun rights gun violence GWF Hegel hard rock health hedonism Hegelianism Henry Kissinger Hillary Clinton history House of Cards Humeanism humor idealism illusion Immanuel Kant incarceration inception inequality institutional racism instrumental value intention intentional vs incidental effects internalism Internalism and externalism Intrinsic and extrinsic properties intrinsic vs extrinsic value intuitionism irony irrealism irreducibility is/ought problem is/ought thesis J.L. Mackie Jack Black jazz Jean-Paul Sartre John Locke Jonathan Dancy Josh Homme justice justice department Kant Kant's idealism Kantianism Karl Marx Kierkegaard Kirchnerism Koch brothers labor law liberalism live music review Loic Wacquant Louie Louis C.K. love ludwig wittgenstein luxury cars March Marxism Mark Timmons Martin Luther King jr Marxism mass incarceration materialism Meta-ethics metaethics metaphysics metaphysics of value Michael Huemer Michael Smith militarism MLK money money in politics monism vs. pluralism moral moral absolutism vs. non-absolutism moral belief moral cognitivism moral dilemma moral disagreement moral epistemology moral explanations moral intuitions moral irrealism Morality Morality Without Foundations moral judgment moral knowledge moral monism moral motivation moral naturalism moral non-naturalism moral observation moral particularism moral perception moral pluralism moral principles moral properties moral rationalism moral realism moral reasons moral reductionism moral responsibility moral semantics moral skepticism moral subjectivism moral twin earth moral value mortality movie critique movie review movies murder music national security national security agency naturalism vs non-naturalism natural vs. non-natural properties neoliberalism Nicholas Sturgeon Nietzsche Non-cognitivism non-reducibility NSA objectivity obligations particularism Paul Ryan personal identity phenomenology Philip Stratton-Lake philosophical naturalism philosophy philosophy of language philosophy of mind philosophy of science Platonism police political advertising Political Philosophy political satire political spending politics populism Poverty practical reason prison prison-industrial complex prison reform progressivism psychology punishment Queens of the Stone Age race race politics racism Ralph Wedgwood Randolph Clarke rationalism rationalism vs empiricism reductionism religion respect review Richard Arneson rightness rights Robert Audi Robot & Frank robot ethics rock n' roll Roger Crisp Ronald Dworkin Russ Shafer-Landau satire science science fiction scientism second formulation of the categorical imperative self-defense self-evidence self-evident beliefs semantics Sheldon Wolin Shelly Kagan Snowden socialism social sciences Socrates solipsism sports spying state surveillance status symbol sui generis supererogatory acts supervenience surveillance synthetic property identities systemic racism Søren Kierkegaard Ta-Nehisi Coates technology terrorism the argument from disagreement the death penalty the doctrine of double effect The Foundations of Ethics the is/ought gap the nature of normativity the open question argument the pursuit of pleasure The Right and the Good the washington post Thomas Hobbes thought experiment time Timothy O'Connor TPP Trans-Pacific Partnership truth Turing Turing Test TV show uber universality in ethics utilitarianism valentine's day value value of life values vegetarian vegetarianism Vijay Iyer Violence Virtue Virtue ethics voting W.D. Ross war water weakness of the will wittgenstein Wolfgang StreekTop Posts & Pages
- Kant's Critique of Descartes (and time, immediacy, and the external world)
- Exploitations, Primary and Secondary, in the Capitalist Mode of Production
- Law and Morality (Columbia MD, gun rights, consequentialism, Kantianism, and client counseling)
- Her (and the Turing test and expressing humanity)
- Kant's Transcendental Idealism (and illusions, phenomena/noumena, and real vs logical possibility)
- Review of Peter Frase's Four Futures: Life After Capitalism
- The Ethics of Love (care ethics, partiality, and pluralism)
- Is Surveillance by the NSA Just? (deontology, Kant, Ross, and the priority of the right)
- Futurama's Bender and Free Will (and compatibilism, Sartre, and jail)
- A Critique of Jonathan Dancy's "Moral Reasons" (Against Dancy's Particularism)
ausomeawestin 
Recent Comments