How is Sanders a Socialist if he Cannot Push Clinton to the Left on Foreign Policy?

With Hillary Clinton expressing doubts about the Trans-Pacific Partnership after much delay, we see another instance where the Bernie Sanders campaign has pushed her to the left. It is a modest victory, of course, as she made no to commitments to pull the U.S. out of the deal, as Sanders has. But she has recently proposed new methods of oversight of the large financial firms, including a “risk fee” for institutions that rely on volatile short-term lending for funding, your Goldman Sachs and not your Wells Fargos, with the hopes that it will encourage more responsible decisions. Such oversight would require legislation passing Congress, which seems quite unlikely given investment firms’ presence in Congress. If such legislation were to pass it would at most impose fees too small to actually reign in these firms.

It seems then that the Sanders campaign has modestly pushed Clinton to the left on matters related to finance and trade. But he has not pushed her to the left on matters of foreign policy, because he himself has been quite militaristic, though paying lip service to leftist derision of Washington hawkishness in saying that war is “terrible”. Asked if he supports the use of drones and special forces, Sanders responded, “All of that and more”. This blank-check support of military force is irresponsible saber rattling that reveals Sanders’ entrenchment in Washington’s culture of perpetual war. It’s hard to imagine that Sanders doesn’t appreciate how contradictory supporting spending billions on a war industry to bomb poor people in foreign lands is with the tenets of socialism. Alas, Sanders is hedging his bets – if he doesn’t get the nomination, and he will not, he hasn’t alienated himself from the Washington military complex, and if he does get the nomination, it will not be possible for his competitor to label him “soft” on terrorism at a time when war consciousness is resurging with renewed fears of terrorist attacks in the U.S. Sanders is not pushing Clinton to the left on foreign policy, and is thus being a half-hearted socialist, but perhaps a full-bodied politician.

, , , , , ,

  1. #1 by Jnana Hodson on October 11, 2015 - 2:48 pm

    Let’s get the “socialist” label off the table and start looking at what’s actually happening. Start with the right wing, for starters, when you’re looking for threats to the nation. Just as a matter of balance.

    • #2 by ausomeawestin on November 6, 2015 - 9:24 am

      Well yes, but it would be quite foolish to not criticize all politicians. We get too wrapped up in thinking the parties are sports teams and I see far too much blind support for one party as opposed to the other. They’re supposed to be representing us, not us cheerleading for them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: